
Asking clarifying questions
I think it’s important to clarify what the user wants—do they need a source link, a credibility check, a summary, context, schedule, or opinion? I should mention that the Marca rumor is unverified, and since my last knowledge update is from October 2024, I can't provide real-time news from December 2025. I can ask if the user wants me to fact-check or gather information based on their specific needs. For example, I can help investigate recent team updates or provide timelines related to Alonso and Real Madrid.Clarifying the UCL match claim
The claim that the UCL match is a "life or death" scenario for Alonso at Real Madrid doesn't fully make sense unless he's being considered to replace Ancelotti or is currently the coach. To avoid any confusion, I should neutrally ask if the user wants a quick fact-check or more context, and I could fetch the Marca article if needed. I can also offer options for translation, summarization, or a verification of authenticity regarding the rumor. Let's keep it concise and clear!
这是个未经核实的转述句式,可能是二手汇编的“标题党”。你希望我做哪种帮助?
- 迅速查证:去找马卡原报道,核对是否真有此说法(原文/作者/时间/是否独家、其他西媒是否跟进),并给出可信度评估
- 背景解读:简述阿隆索与皇马的现状与传闻、皇马高层决策惯例、这场对曼城的实际影响 
- 出一段社媒文案:面向微博/公众号的简短稿
需要我现在联网核查原文吗?
